[NTG-context] How to implement word corrections

2023-12-27 Thread Jairo A. del Rio
Hi, list! I'm writing a small module to print word corrections, e.g., things like "irregardless" > "regardless"or "alverja" > "arveja" ('pea' in Spanish) with overstrikes and underlines, but I want feedback to make a module in the ConTeXt fashion.

[NTG-context] barring changes

2022-07-28 Thread Henning Hraban Ramm via ntg-context
\underrandom doesn’t work \underrandoms doesn’t work \overbar works, but not in TABLE \overbars works \overstrike works, but not in TABLE \overstrikes works \understrike works, but not in TABLE \understrikes works The nested example \overbar{Über} \underbar{Unterstrich \underbar{steigt

Re: [NTG-context] double underbars

2021-11-30 Thread Denis Maier via ntg-context
v 2021, at 12:06, Denis Maier via ntg-context >> cont...@ntg.nl> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> for a current project I’ll need different variants of underbars. > >>> > >>> - A normal underbar > >>>

Re: [NTG-context] double underbars

2021-11-30 Thread Taco Hoekwater via ntg-context
>> - A combination of both >>> >>> Is there a way to combine them? I was hoping to have the dotted variant >> above the normal bar. >> >> I would like to have this type of “complete” bar nesting as well. >> >> As it stands, you can nest \underba

Re: [NTG-context] double underbars

2021-11-30 Thread Henning Hraban Ramm via ntg-context
Am 30.11.21 um 14:19 schrieb Taco Hoekwater via ntg-context: I would like to have this type of “complete” bar nesting as well. YES, #metoo As it stands, you can nest \underbars inside \underbars and \overstrikes inside \overstrikes and \overbars inside \overbars, but no other combinations

Re: [NTG-context] double underbars

2021-11-30 Thread Denis Maier via ntg-context
this type of “complete” bar nesting as well. > > As it stands, you can nest \underbars inside \underbars and \overstrikes > inside \overstrikes and \overbars inside \overbars, but no other > combinations work. Interoperability between these (as well as \underdot, > \underdash, \underrandom

Re: [NTG-context] double underbars

2021-11-30 Thread Taco Hoekwater via ntg-context
hem? I was hoping to have the dotted variant above > the normal bar. I would like to have this type of “complete” bar nesting as well. As it stands, you can nest \underbars inside \underbars and \overstrikes inside \overstrikes and \overbars inside \overbars, but no other combinations work.

Re: [NTG-context] Bar within math (amended)

2020-06-15 Thread Henning Hraban Ramm
kground=color, >> backgroundcolor=yellow] >> >> \starttext >> >> \m{1 + 2 = \unit{3 kilo newton}} >> >> \m{1 + 2 = \Highlight{\unit{3 kilo newton}}} >> >> \stoptext >> >> Wolfgang >> > > Is there a way

Re: [NTG-context] Bar within math (amended)

2020-06-11 Thread Axel Kielhorn
+ 2 = \unit{3 kilo newton}} > > \m{1 + 2 = \Highlight{\unit{3 kilo newton}}} > > \stoptext > > Wolfgang > Is there a way to highlight just the words and leave the space white? Something like \overstrikes? Greetings Axel

Re: [NTG-context] ConTeXt-ifying Kile

2008-01-02 Thread Matija Šuklje
# \NR \numbers{text} \overbar{text} \overbars{text text} # \overlaybutton # \overlayfigure \overstrike{text} \overstrikes{text text} \packed \page[options] \pagereference[reference] \pagetype[name] \paragraph \part[references]{text} \periods[number] \placebookmarks[names][names|all

Re: [NTG-context] Problems mapping Xml into ConTeXt

2006-10-12 Thread Hans Hagen
, as well as \underbars, \overstrike, \overstrikes, \low, \high and \lohi. You mentioned that \underbar (and presumably the others I mentioned above) are macros taking arguments e.g. \acommand{...}. However presumably something like \midaligned{...} is also a macro requiring an argument

Re: [NTG-context] Problems mapping Xml into ConTeXt

2006-10-12 Thread Michael Wigston
with \underbar, as well as \underbars, \overstrike, \overstrikes, \low, \high and \lohi. You mentioned that \underbar (and presumably the others I mentioned above) are macros taking arguments e.g. \acommand{...}. However presumably something like \midaligned{...} is also a macro requiring

Re: [NTG-context] Problems mapping Xml into ConTeXt

2006-10-11 Thread Michael Wigston
, \overstrike, \overstrikes, \low, \high and \lohi. You mentioned that \underbar (and presumably the others I mentioned above) are macros taking arguments e.g. \acommand{...}. However presumably something like \midaligned{...} is also a macro requiring an argument, but this works as a \defineXMLgrouped

Re: [NTG-context] beta (04.10.06)

2006-10-10 Thread Hans Hagen
. The command is needed for \overstrikes. ok, added to syst-fnt thanks or noticing Hans - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel

[NTG-context] Problems mapping Xml into ConTeXt

2006-10-10 Thread Michael Wigston
problems implementing the following commands: - \underbar, \underbars, \overstrike, \overstrikes, \low, \high and \lohi I was expecting that they would all easily be defined using the \defineXMLgrouped [name] {command} element mapping. There is probably something very simple that I have

Re: [NTG-context] beta (04.10.06)

2006-10-05 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
(replaced by lan-mis) to another file. The command is needed for \overstrikes. Wolfgang ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context

[NTG-context] visualising evolution from one version to another

2006-08-06 Thread Peter Münster
-versionY.tex with added text in some colour and deleted text displayed with \overstrikes{}. Do you have some ideas, how to do that? Cheers, Peter -- http://pmrb.free.fr/contact/ ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman

Re: [NTG-context] visualising evolution from one version to another

2006-08-06 Thread Taco Hoekwater
doc-versionX.tex and doc-versionY.tex with added text in some colour and deleted text displayed with \overstrikes{}. Do you have some ideas, how to do that? You need a way to create a merged ConTeXt document from the two separate files, perhaps using something like this: http

Re: [NTG-context] visualising evolution from one version to another

2006-08-06 Thread Taco Hoekwater
I need. I've also found a shell version: wdiff But I still have one problem: I can't have a paragraph in \overstrikes. Is there perhaps something like \startoverstrikes ... \stopoverstrikes ? Not that I know of. It should be possible to cook something up with metafun and/or \starttextbackgrounds

Re: [NTG-context] visualising evolution from one version to another

2006-08-06 Thread Peter Münster
a shell version: wdiff But I still have one problem: I can't have a paragraph in \overstrikes. Is there perhaps something like \startoverstrikes ... \stopoverstrikes ? Here is a little script, to show what I'm doing now: #!/bin/bash OLD=$1 NEW=$2 OUT=$3 shift 3 echo '\setupcolors[state=start